Georg Steller’s contributions to natural and social history in Russia have been, I believe, undervalued. This is due partly to the thunderclap of discovery that defined his time with Vitus Bering—the first European exploration of Alaska would overshadow anyone’s other work—but also to how his records were handled by the Russian authorities Steller answered to. At the time of his expeditions, the Russian Empire was jealous of the information Steller (and all the other scientists) put to paper, keeping it hidden from foreign powers also eager to exploit the riches of the North Pacific.
Other specifics in Steller’s journals on Siberia and the Russian Far East, particularly of life in these wild regions far from the gilded palaces of St. Petersburg, contained details the government likely preferred remain quiet. Corruption was rampant, laws were haphazardly designed, and services such as rudimentary health care were often absent. In the passages here, Steller documented a months-long epidemic that killed Russians (but did not affect the indigenous Buryats) and saw injustice in the burden of taxes levied on the neediest peasants. Comparing the poor with the rich in March 1740, he wrote that
as a general rule about Siberia, it can be noted that the people in poor and bad places are much more industrious and of a better mind-set than in rich places and those of abundance. There is no house in these parts where hemp and burlap are not spun and woven for shirts and pants; young and old are intent on saving themselves from poverty as much as possible. Whereas in Irkutsk the womenfolk—as soon as the tea and cabbage soup have been prepared—can be found lying together on the stove like sausages in a frying pan, smoking their asses so they don’t rot and fall apart from all the moving and whoring.
Although some of Steller’s documents were released soon after his death and acted as vital references for future explorers of the North Pacific, the sensitive nature of Steller’s texts meant that the breadth of his discoveries and observations remained—and to some degree still remains—unexplored. His notes were locked away; some were lost to subsequent decay or misplaced, while others sat near-indecipherable in the Latin and eighteenth-century German they were written in. Remarkably, the dissolution of the Soviet Union cracked these long-sealed vaults as well, and a number of Steller’s records have come to light in recent decades. This volume was among that valuable cache.
* * *
Steller’s legacy in the North Pacific is subtle but deeply pervasive. Like Vladimir Arsenyev, who detailed explorations of the areas south of the Amur River in Across the Ussuri Kray (Indiana University Press, 2016), Steller seemed most comfortable describing vegetation when he wrote about nature. It is therefore unsurprising that the greatest number of taxa named after him today are plants. In Appendix D of this volume, translators Margritt Engel and Karen Willmore list two genera (Dendrostellera and Stellera) and ten species that still carry his name, from Steller’s leek to a perennial herb called Veronica stelleri, and note an additional fifteen species that, given the ever-evolving nature of scientific and common species names, were once called “Steller” but no longer are.
Steller’s detailed lists of plants—important for understanding how vegetation communities may have changed in the last three hundred years—are ample, and his descriptions of the natural world are thoughtful. For example, somewhere in eastern Yakutia (near the Ancha River, a tributary of the Allakh-Yun River), Steller encountered permafrost for the first time and, not knowing what it was but recognizing it as special, wrote the following: “I saw a curious phenomenon in the woods. A stream flowed between two mountains separated from each other by half a kilometer. On both sides the cut banks were made of ice up to two feet thick. On top of the ice were soil and muskeg and very tall larch trees. I gathered that this ice has never thawed and has been lying here since times immemorial and represents solid ground.”
Steller recorded few birds in his journals here. As an ornithologist with twenty years of experience in the Russian Far East, one of my joys in translating Across the Ussuri Kray was deciphering the birds Vladimir Arsenyev saw but could not identify. For example, Arsenyev wrote about “grebes here and there in the pools of standing water, these birds had protruding ear tufts and a collar of colorful feathers.”1 These key characteristics allowed me to confidently identify these birds as great crested grebes (Podiceps cristatus). Steller, unfortunately, gives readers less information to work with. At one point he noticed “two kinds of gulls that live on the sea: one was black-and-white spotted on the back; the other was all black, longish, and gaunt with long, narrow wings.” Heinrich Springer, an Alaskan ornithologist who helped the translators with bird identifications in this text, was justifiably perplexed. In his notes he suggested that the first bird, the “black-and-white spotted” one, might be a juvenile gull, as many young gulls are mottled in their plumage. The second bird, he proposed, was perhaps a storm petrel or maybe a black tern. But if Steller is confusing a petrel or a tern with a gull, this second mystery bird might be a wide range of things. Certain color morphs of the parasitic (Stercorarius parasiticus) or long-tailed (S. longicaudus) jaegers, for example, meet his descriptions, as does a sooty shearwater (Puffinus griseus), a short-tailed shearwater (P. tenuirostris), or a dark phase of the northern fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis). It could even be something far more exotic, like a lesser frigatebird (Fregata ariel)—a highly nomadic, lithe species documented as far north as the Tartary Strait and the Amur River mouth, but never as far north in the Sea of Okhotsk as Steller was at the time.2
Steller’s clumsiness with bird identification is somewhat ironic, given that he is perhaps best recognized today by ornithologists and birdwatchers for the three striking avian species that carry his name. There is Steller’s sea eagle (Haliaeetus pelagicus), a gorgeous raptor and close relative of North America’s bald eagle (H. leucocephalus), unmistakable with its enormous orange bill and patterned plumage of rich blacks and bright whites. The largest eagle in the world (by mass) and a salmon eater, it breeds along the Sea of Okhotsk and eastern Kamchatka coasts and was likely a common sight for Steller throughout much of his time in the region. He mentioned these eagles in his journals, but the species was not formally described to science until Peter Pallas, an accomplished naturalist in his own right who had idolized Steller as a child, published Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica and named this bird in Steller’s honor.3
Next is Steller’s eider (Polysticta stelleri)—also named by Pallas—a beautiful, enigmatic creature of the northern seas. It breeds in the high Arctic on both sides of the Bering Strait and winters off the coasts of southern Alaska, Kamchatka, the Kuril Islands, and the Commander Islands. The latter of these contain what is now called Bering Island, where Steller, Bering, and others were stranded when their ship, the St. Peter, crashed into it; this island is the site of Bering’s grave.
Last is Steller’s jay (Cyanocitta stelleri)—the first bird in Alaska to be felled by a bullet, when Steller’s assistant brought one down along the shores of Kayak Island a year after the adventures described here.4 Steller recognized this jay’s similarity in plumage to the ubiquitous North American blue jay (C. cristata) he’d seen renderings of, and he felt certain this bird was a representative of American fauna. The St. Peter was indeed moored along the continent they had sought. Steller was also the first person to describe to science the spectacled cormorant (Phalacrocorax perspicillatus)—the largest known cormorant species—and the northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus).
If we assemble the birds and mammals Steller described or that carry his