The Dot of Noah’s-Darwin’s: the Ark, evolution, totemism and interspecific wars. Correspondence with anthropological journals. Oleg Kot

is irreversible. The species has many genes that are changed by mutations, and the previous forms are absent”. Maybe because of that (Genesis 6, 6—7)?

      Auklet flock, Shumagins 1986.

      4.4. The biblical anachronism of the sibses or siblings for 50 thousand years was able to engender to all modern terrestrial fauna. And all for whom the ark became the native house, gravitated to each other. This aura of attraction eventually acquires the character of permanent small biological communities – populations. One more indisputable postulate of the synthetic theory: “The elementary unit of evolution is the population as an elementary structural unit of the species”. And I’ll just continue. “Inasmuch as at the dot of Noah’s-Darwin’s all the species diversity of the planet narrows to a historical minimum – randomly selected pairs from each species”. The unlimited random mating of these couples has led to emergence of steady populations on the basis of pair speciation.

      A pack of wolves in Yellowstone Park.

      4.5. Darwin spent five years on the waves of the biblical flood. He described it as “natural selection”. “The main or even the only driving factor of evolution is the survival of the fittest, based on the selection (selection’s) of random and small mutations” (postulate №2). The Flood took the life of the overwhelming majority and gave it to an insignificant minority. Therefore, criteria of the species of evolutionary theory are unacceptable to all biological species in time. This is why the concept of the species is absent in paleontology. “All fossil forms remain outside the biological concept of the species, they are supposed to use terms such as ‘chronospecies’ or ‘phratrie’ as equivalents of the species. But replacing terms does not solve the problem. <…> The same species criteria do not apply to forms without a sexual process, agamic, amphimictic, parthenogenetic forms” – postulate №9 of the theory (Vorontsov 2004