Where there is the tree of knowledge,
there is always Paradise
And you will know the truth,
And the truth will make you free
Part One
MAN IN THE SCIENTIFIC PICTURE OF THE WORLD
The “father” of humanistic psychology Abraham Maslow was engaged not so much in sick people and causes of diseases, as in study of healthy people (who have “realized themselves”), trying to understand where human health comes from. His long-lasting observations resulted in a conclusion that the source of health lies in the person himself. A person is healthy if he uses all his abilities, strengths, and talents (self-actualization). He reveals his feelings to the fullest, outward-oriented on the perception of the surrounding world and inward-directing experiences of external impressions. No human emotions are alien to such a person; he is open to all forms of their expression. These people, according to John Powell, see the beauty of the world, hear its music and poetry, perceive a unique flavor of each day; they know the admiration of any moment of existence. Practically healthy people will not live mindlessly in a strange world. They are well aware of the wise saying of Socrates: “It is not worth living without thinking” and we will add “and acting”. They are able to correctly question the life and flexible enough to let it raise questions and tasks before them. To live life to the full means to have developed imagination and sense of humor, retain spontaneity and liveliness of emotions and sensitively listen to the voice of nature, which in its constant development subjects human to it too. Care and love – this is the main content of the relationship of these people to everything and everyone. And when they encounter the shady side of the life they understand its objectivity and try to perceive its reason; and to perceive means to forgive. Forgiveness for them is restoration of internal harmony which is actually the basement the health rests on. Healthy people truly love and truly respect themselves and respecting themselves they respect others. Every tomorrow – is a new opportunity, which is eagerly awaited. Life and death find meaning for them. And when the hour of death, their hearts are full of gratitude for what has been, for “The Way They Were,” for the whole life experience.
MAN IN MEDICINE
MENTAL HEALTH
In medicine it is accepted to speak about individual approach to a patient but behind this concept there is no content that a beginner doctor could learn. Individual has evolved from specimen (biological being) to individual and then to the upper stage of evolution – personality. Carl Rogers was the first who disclosed the difference between the concepts “personality” and “person” – individual. The concept “individual” refers to a carrier of physiological peculiarities of Homo sapiens as a rational being endowed with consciousness and will in whom psychic and biological constitute a single unit and individual actualization – for myself – prevails. For the purposes of medicine, we shall accept the following definition of “personality”: personality is a human who climbed the top step of evolution and has become a social person. His actualization already lies mainly in the sphere of society, in his relationships with other people at all levels of his activity. As the core of the personality appear relations between people in any social medium, for the benefit of which he consciously positively thinks and acts. Individual as an object of doctor’s professional activity is the product of several complex variables, each being complex by itself. These variables are:
• biological component – the body;
• mental component – human psyche;
• social component – the environment.
Each component changes depending on the temporal factor and external effects retaining at that its specific features, its basic function, its mechanisms for realization of existing capabilities and its range of improvement and development.
Example: consider the human organism, his body. It has relatively rigid boundaries and limits of variation. But if we recall bodybuilding, abilities developed by the person practicing yoga, it becomes clear that it is within a person’s power to change also his body despite its biological boundaries. Each variable has a tendency to change and to develop as it is built in the informational combination of bio-psycho-social reflection of the reality.
Human has acquired a huge resource of variability and evolution at the expense of consciousness and will. To date there is no uniform concept of human. We will adhere to a concept that treats human as a developing conscious volitional trinity in both phylo-and ontogenesis. Actualization as a psychological phenomenon manifests itself in realization of possibilities and capabilities ensuring personal growth, self-perfection and self-respect that comprise the main purpose of life for a male. Actualization in contrast to the tendency towards equilibrium (homeostasis) is often due not to a decrease but to an increase in strain. Being optimally actualized, such a person lives a full and bright life every new moment of it. He personally chooses his way of life, as a source of information uses his perceptions, feelings and thoughts rather than other people’s advice. Having made his choice, he is responsible for the consequences of the choice and never blames others but himself. Such people make up the fully functioning human formation that “adjusts life of humanity on the earth”. It is mainly male formation at the age of 35–60.
Today we can speak of a new trend in health care, the trend of studying the role of psyche and brain in human health and illness.
In regulations, programs, and in general it has become popular to talk not only about the bodily but also about the mental health. Behind the facade of popular terms, there is no common understanding of “what the mental health is”. Often, the activity of reforms is reduced to the replacement of just a name, for example, “Center for Mental Health” instead of “Psychiatric Hospital”. As a result the accumulated problems of mental health are not solved, but on the contrary become veiled and deeper, not removing stigma, not improving the state of patients with mental problems, moreover not improving their health. The problem of health and illness, norm and pathology is complicated; their boundaries are relative and depend on many factors and reasons. This is the consequence of the complexity of the very object of study – psyche, its characteristics and properties, criteria to be guided to determine “mental health”.
Study of the population of practically healthy people showed that about 50 % of adults had one or more symptoms of mental register manifested in the form of anxiety, irritability, constant strain, alarm, chronic fatigue, asthenia, insomnia, bad mood. The majority of these people did not apply to a specialist: 71 % – did not undertake whatsoever, 1 % – shared their fears with friends or relatives and only 17 % applied to a doctor. Early symptoms are not well pronounced because more frequently they are connected with deadaptation, functional by their nature and do not much worry a person, his environment and doctors. This is the first level of change in mental health, which should be the object of great attention of primary care doctors. Being in the very focus of attention, these states when timely diagnosed and correctly handled, are reversible.
The following characteristics are distinguished in mental health:
• the field of mental health;
• boundaries of mental health;
• quality of human life.
The field of mental health implies the sphere and range of person’s activity in which individual is adapted. It is enlarged or narrowed depending on the society’s requirements, in other words, the field of mental health due to the specificity of psyche and its laws does not have unique determination. Therefore it is important to specify the concept “Mental health” and define its levels. The boundaries of mental health are the “limits” of acceptable behavior in the society. The boundaries of mental health were historically correlated with the ruling basic vision of religion, philosophy, politics. Today the term “Quality of life”