Astronomical Curiosities: Facts and Fallacies. Gore John Ellard. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Gore John Ellard
Издательство: Public Domain
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Физика
Год издания: 0
isbn:
Скачать книгу
ball of the planet. Prof. Slipher says that “none of the absorption bands in the spectrum of Saturn can be identified with those bands due to absorption in the earth’s atmosphere,” and there is no trace of aqueous vapour.166

      In September, 1907, M. G. Fournier suspected the existence of a “faint transparent and luminous ring” outside the principal rings of Saturn. He thinks that it may possibly be subject to periodical fluctuations of brightness, sometimes being visible and sometimes not.167 This dusky ring was again suspected at the Geneva Observatory in October, 1908.168 M. Schaer found it a difficult object with a 16-inch Cassegrain reflector. Prof. Stromgen at Copenhagen, and Prof. Hartwig at Bamberg, however, failed to see any trace of the supposed ring.169 It was seen at Greenwich in October, 1908.

      A “dark transit” of Saturn’s satellite Titan across the disc of the planet has been observed on several occasions. It was seen by Mr. Isaac W. Ward, of Belfast, on March 27, 1892, with a 4·3-inch Wray refractor. The satellite appeared smaller than its shadow. The phenomenon was also seen on March 12 of the same year by the Rev. A. Freeman, Mr. Mee, and M. F. Terby; and again on November 6, 1907, by Mr. Paul Chauleur and Mr. A. B. Cobham.170

      The recently discovered tenth satellite of Saturn, Themis, was discovered by photography, and has never been seen by the eye even with the largest telescopes! But its existence is beyond all doubt, and its orbit round the planet has been calculated.

      Prof. Hussey of the Lick Observatory finds that Saturn’s satellite Mimas is probably larger than Hyperion. He also finds from careful measurements that the diameter of Titan is certainly overestimated, and that its probable diameter is about 2500 miles.171

      The French astronomer, M. Lucien Rudaux, finds the following variation in the light of the satellites of Saturn: —

      The variation of light is, he thinks, due to the fact that the period of rotation of each satellite is equal to that of their revolution round the planet; as in the case of our moon.172

      The names of the satellites of Saturn are derived from the ancient heathen mythology. They are given in order of distance from the planet, the nearest being Mimas and the farthest Themis.

      1. Mimas was a Trojan born at the same time as Paris.

      2. Enceladus was son of Tartarus and Ge.

      3. Tethys was wife of Oceanus, god of ocean currents. She became mother of all the chief rivers in the universe, as also the Oceanides or sea nymphs.

      4. Dione was one of the wives of Zeus.

      5. Rhea was a daughter of Uranus. She married Saturn, and became the mother of Vesta, Ceres, Juno, and Pluto.

      6. Titan was the eldest son of Uranus.

      7. Hyperion was the god of day, and the father of sun and moon.

      8. Japetus was the fifth son of Uranus, and father of Atlas and Prometheus.173

      9. Phœbe was daughter of Uranus and Ge.

      10. Themis was daughter of Uranus and Ge, and, therefore, sister of Phœbe.

      In a review of Prof. Comstock’s Text Book of Astronomy in The Observatory, November, 1901, the remark occurs, “We are astonished to see that Mr. Comstock alludes with apparent seriousness to the nine satellites of Saturn. As regards the ninth satellite, we thought that all astronomers held with Mrs. Betsy Prig on the subject of this astronomical Mrs. Harris.” This reads curiously now (1909) when the existence of the ninth satellite (Phœbe) has been fully confirmed, and a tenth satellite discovered.

       CHAPTER X

      Uranus and Neptune

      From observations of Uranus made in 1896, M. Leo Brenner concluded that the planet rotates on its axis in about 8½ hours (probably 8h 27m). This is a short period, but considering the short periods of Jupiter and Saturn there seems to be nothing improbable about it.

      Prof. Barnard finds that the two inner satellites of Uranus are difficult objects even with the great 36-inch telescope of the Lick Observatory! They have, however, been photographed at Cambridge (U.S.A.) with a 13-inch lens, although they are “among the most difficult objects known.”174

      Sir William Huggins in 1871 found strong absorption lines (six strong lines) in the spectrum of Uranus. One of these lines indicated the presence of hydrogen, a gas which does not exist in our atmosphere. Three of the other lines seen were situated near lines in the spectrum of atmospheric air. Neither carbonic acid nor sodium showed any indications of their presence in the planet’s spectrum. A photograph by Prof. Slipher of Neptune’s spectrum “shows the spectrum of this planet to contain many strong absorption bands. These bands are so pronounced in the part of the spectrum between the Fraunhofer lines F and D, as to leave the solar spectrum unrecognizable… Neptune’s spectrum is strikingly different from that of Uranus, the bands in the latter planet all being reinforced in Neptune. In this planet there are also new bands which have not been observed in any of the other planets. The F line of hydrogen is remarkably dark … this band is of more than solar strength in the spectrum of Uranus also. Thus free hydrogen seems to be present in the atmosphere of both these planets. This and the other dark bands in these planets bear evidence of an enveloping atmosphere of gases which is quite unlike that which surrounds the earth.”175

      With the 18-inch equatorial telescope of the Strasburgh Observatory, M. Wirtz measured the diameter of Neptune, and found from forty-nine measures made between December 9, 1902, and March 28, 1903, a value of 2″·303 at a distance of 30·1093 (earth’s distance from sun = 1). This gives a diameter of 50,251 kilometres, or about 31,225 miles,176 and a mean density of 1·54 (water = 1; earth’s mean density = 5·53). Prof. Barnard’s measures gave a diameter of 32,900 miles, a fairly close agreement, considering the difficulty of measuring so small a disc as that shown by Neptune.

      The satellite of Neptune was photographed at the Pulkown Observatory in the year 1899. The name Triton has been suggested for it. In the old Greek mythology Triton was a son of Neptune, so the name would be an appropriate one.

      The existence of a second satellite of Neptune is suspected by Prof. Schaeberle, who thinks he once saw it with the 36-inch telescope of the Lick Observatory “on an exceptionally fine night” in 1895.177 But this supposed discovery has not yet been confirmed. Lassell also thought he had discovered a second satellite, but this supposed discovery was never confirmed.[178]

      The ancient Burmese mention eight planets, the sun, the moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and another named Râhu, which is invisible. It has been surmised that “Râhu” is Uranus, which is just visible to the naked eye, and may possibly have been discovered by keen eyesight in ancient times. The present writer has seen it several times without optical aid in the West of Ireland, and with a binocular field-glass of 2 inches aperture he found it quite a conspicuous object.

      When Neptune was visually discovered by Galle, at Berlin, he was assisted in his observation by Prof. d’Arrest. The incident is thus described by Dr. Dreyer, “On the night of June 14, 1874, while observing Coggia’s comet together, I reminded Prof. d’Arrest how he had once said in the course of a lecture, that he had been present at the finding of Neptune, and that ‘he might say it would not have been found without him.’ He then told me (and I wrote it down the next day), how he had suggested the use of Bremiker’s map (as first mentioned by Dr. Galle in 1877) and continued, ‘We then went back to the dome, where there was a


<p>166</p>

Astrophysical Journal, vol. 26 (1907), p. 60.

<p>167</p>

Nature, January 30, 1908.

<p>168</p>

Ibid., October 15, 1908.

<p>169</p>

Ibid., October 29, 1908.

<p>170</p>

Journal, B.A.A., March, 1908, and June 22, 1908.

<p>171</p>

Nature, June 25, 1903.

<p>172</p>

Bulletin, Ast. Soc. de France, June, 1904.

<p>173</p>

Pop. Ast., vol. 12, pp. 408-9.

<p>174</p>

Nature, August 29, 1889.

<p>175</p>

Astrophysical Journal, vol. 26 (1907), p. 62.

<p>176</p>

Bulletin, Ast. Soc. de France, January, 1904.

<p>177</p>

Humboldt’s Cosmos, vol. iv. p. 532.