Основы международного корпоративного налогообложения. Владимир Гидирим. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Владимир Гидирим
Издательство: Автор
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Бухучет, налогообложение, аудит
Год издания: 2016
isbn: 978-5-9908572-2-3
Скачать книгу
Harris, David Oliver. International Commercial Tax. Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 28.

      97

      Alfred Nizamiev. The Main Characteristics of State’s Jurisdiction to Tax in International Dimension. LM Theses and Essays. 2003. Paper 36. URL: http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/stu_llm/36/.

      98

      F. Mann, The doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law, III RdC 1964-I. P. 30.

      99

      Ibid. p. 15.; Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha. The Jurisdiction to Tax in International Law: Theory and Practice of Legislative Fiscal Jurisdiction. Deventer – Boston, 1989. P. 13–14.

      100

      Restatement (Second) of Law, Foreign Relations Law of the United States, Section S, 1962; Kathleen Hixson, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Under the Third Restatement of Foreign Relations Law of the United States – Fordham. International Law Journal. Issue 1. 1988 (art. 6).

      101

      Jean Marc Rivier, Droit Fiscal Suisse: Le Droit Fiscal International (1983). Le pouvoir d’édicter des norms de droit fiscal et de les appliquer pour lever l’impôt.

      102

      J. H. Beale. The jurisdiction of a Sovereign State. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 36. P. 241.

      103

      Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha. The Jurisdiction to Tax in International Law: Theory and Practice of Legislative Fiscal Jurisdiction. Deventer – Boston, 1989. P. 13.

      104

      George W. Cook (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States. Reports of International Arbitral Awards, 1927. P. 209–213, 213–217.

      105

      Santa Clara Estates Case (Supplementary Claim), 1903. P. 455–460.

      106

      Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha. The Jurisdiction to Tax in International Law: Theory and Practice of Legislative Fiscal Jurisdiction. Deventer – Boston, 1989. Р. 46.

      107

      Ibid. P. 44.

      108

      S. S. Lotus (France v. Turkey) 1927 P.C.I.J. Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A. № 10. Collection of Judgments. A.W. Sijthoff’s Publishing Company. Leyden, 1927. URL: www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_10/30_Lotus_Arret.pdf.

      109

      См. также: Блищенко И. П., Дориа Ж. Экономический суверенитет государства. М.: Изд-во РУДН, 2000; Малеев Ю. Н. Международное воздушное право. Вопросы теории и практики. М.: Международные отношения, 1986. С. 75; Лазарев М. И. О понятии правопорядка в Мировом океане // Вопросы международного морского и воздушного права: сб. статей. М.: Ин-т государства и права, 1979. С. 8.

      110

      W. Riphagen. Some Reflections on «Functional Sovereignty». Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 6. 1975. Р. 121–165. URL: journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=5114160.

      111

      Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha. Extraterritorial Taxation in International Law / Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in theory and practice. Dr. Karl M. Meessen ed., 1996. Р. 31–32.

      112

      Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha. The Jurisdiction to Tax in International Law: Theory and Practice of Legislative Fiscal Jurisdiction. Deventer – Boston, 1989. Р. 64.

      113

      David H. Rosenbloom. Taxing the Income of Foreign Controlled Corporations. 36 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 1525, 1532. 2001.

      114

      Ex parte Blain; In re Sawers (1879) LR 12 Chancery Division 522 at 526.

      115

      Clark (Inspector of Taxes) v. Oceanic Contractors Inc. (1983) 1 ALL ER 133.

      116

      Clark v. Oceanic Contractors Inc. (1983) Lord Scarman: «Parliament recognises the almost universally accepted principle that fiscal legislation is not enforceable outside the limits of the territorial sovereignty of the Kingdom. Fiscal legislation is no doubt drafted in the knowledge that it is the practice of nations not to enforce the fiscal legislation of other nations. But, in the absence of any clear indications to the contrary it does not necessarily follow that Parliament has in its fiscal legislation intended any limitation other than that imposed by such unenforceability».

      117

      Agassi v. Robinson (Inspector of Taxes) [2006]1 WLR 2126. 186. URL: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd060517/agasro.pdf.

      118

      Louis Henkin. International Law: Politics, Values and Functions. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1989.

      119

      Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1987), § 431.

      120

      S. S. Lotus (France v. Turkey) 1927 P.C.I.J. Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A. № 10. Collection of Judgments. A.W. Sijthoff’s Publishing Company. Leyden, 1927. URL: www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_10/30_Lotus_Arret.pdf.

      121

      United States v. Toyota Motor Corp. (1983) USDCC Cal.

      122

      Kees van Raad. Non-discrimination in international tax law. Series on international taxation № 6. Kluwer Law International, 1986. Р. 20. Ref. 10.

      123

      Milwaukee County v. M.E. White Co., 296 U.S. 268 (1935). URL: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/296/268.html.

      124

      Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Revenue Division) v. Taylor and Another (1955) A.C. 491. URL: www.uniset.ca/other/css/1955AC491.html.

      125

      United States of America v. Harden (1963) S.C.R. 366. URL: uniset.ca/other/cs5/1963SCR366.html.

      126

      Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia v. Gilbertson (1979). URL: law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/597/1161/125691.

      127

      Sociata Anonima Principe Di Paterno Moncada v. INPS // International Law Reports. Vol. 71. C. J. Greenwood, E. Lauterpacht; Cambridge, Grotius Publications Limited, 1986. URL: