We will not develop this thought further. I hope you understood what the point was. Let's return to our worlds.
Let's think about it. Why should this signal find its mate in a distant world, or rather, another world? Here we have to agree that like begets like. That is, although it is still difficult for us to even understand it, signals of entangled pairs can be transformed into some kind of a code of the mind. After all, we can determine the chemical composition of a star and even planets near it by spectral analysis of the light emitted by it. Now that's not surprising. We believe that for the search of the mind in the universe it would be more logical to send us to them, by the way, as well as them to us, a signal at the frequency of radiation of hydrogen, or carbon, or other elements necessary for the origin and existence of life in general. At least as we understand it. Certain atoms are necessary for life to arise. All living things are composed mainly of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, and small amounts of heavier elements, from phosphorus and calcium to iron.
In the work "Scientific bases of the problem of existence and search for extraterrestrial civilizations", which was published in 1985, Professor Troitsky writes: "More than twenty years ago in the journal Nature J. Cocconi and F. Morrison drew attention to the fact that with the current state of radio technology is possible to establish two-way radio communication between civilizations in our Galaxy. But for this both correspondents need to know the wavelength, the direction of sending and receiving radio signals and the time of communication. The merit of the authors of the work was the assumption that for communication should be chosen wave 21 cm, because it should be known to all civilizations as the radiation of neutral interstellar hydrogen. At this wave, mankind continuously conducts radio astronomical studies of the distribution of hydrogen in the Galaxy and other galaxies, which increases the likelihood of accidental detection of radiation sent by any VC at a wavelength of 21 cm in order to draw attention to themselves and receive response signals."
After this work immediately began the search for such signals with the help of large radio telescopes that already existed by that time. The search was based on the assumption that there could be a civilization with a sufficiently large age in the technological phase, which had begun to send signals into space earlier than we did.
And now about why I consider the unrecognized mutual influence of electron pairs in different worlds to be natural. Note: not only should they naturally and mutually influence each other, but they should find these very worlds. Yes, I realize this is unbelievable and amazing. But weren't the statements about the magnetic poles of the planet and the invention of the compass amazing? It seems like a simple device, but it gave so much to our world. It could be the same in this case. We search, we guess, and everything is elementary, as the famous character Conan Doyle said.
My hypothesis is that we can't get to the wrong place. The entangled pair… that is, the second part of that pair is already there, so the path is already there. Some kind of route line. So the change signals sent from here will be reflected there. Don't you get my idea? Or you, if it's easier for you to understand your interlocutor… The system works like a flashlight and the area it illuminates. The flashlight sends out a beam and it's there in a flash. We generate these particles here, and their entangled pairs are already there. They're not wandering around somewhere. These worlds are really interconnected. Like the waters of the world's oceans, like the ecosystem of the world.
However, even if the worlds are the same – that doesn't mean there isn't a variant of reflection warp… It's all god knows where. Across the universe, stars, nebulae, and more. You know what I mean? The signal will get into the field of influence of radiation, and quasars, and black holes, and gravity of galaxies… and if the influence is mutual, then the minimum change there – and here will be not a slap, but a shot from a cannon. A kiss there and a carnival there, a quarrel there and an international scandal there. After all, let's say that the same statement can be transmitted to another person, for example, with a changed intonation, and the perception, and consequently the emotional state, will be different. Correspondingly, the action from the received signal may be different as well.
Chapter 8: A World with Opposite Indicators
And now let's look from the point of view of science, whether there is any hint of the real existence of the opposite… or, let's say, with opposite indicators… world. Turns out there is. And with great precision. Meet His Majesty the antiproton. Let's get acquainted with it, see, so to speak, who it is, where it comes from and how we should live with it.
Antiproton is an antiparticle with respect to the proton. It has a negative electric charge and negative baryonic number, other properties coincide with those of the proton. It's very important, all these coincidences. First discovered in 1955 at the proton gas pedal at the University of California, Berkeley. Antiprotons are born, with a fairly high probability, in high-energy collisions of nucleons. This is the common name for the protons and neutrons that make up the atomic nucleus. Antiprotons are observed in cosmic rays coming to Earth.
О! Doesn't that give you something to think about? You might even say, "aliens are among us." What did you think? Imagine, there are more living things inside our bodies than there are people on Earth. And now think, if we want to establish a connection with them, to what level we need to "descend" and in the way of thinking and size? Don't hurry to laugh, we have already connected with them as soon as we discovered them… and even before that, without knowing them. Since they affect us, some positively, others negatively, and we use them or "fight" them, we are in contact. At least our brain and nervous system do. That's the paradox. However, let's return to the main topic.
As for the antiproton – this is very important. If there is an antiproton, why shouldn't there be an "anti" of all elements? Now we ask ourselves: what kind of world would they then put together? Or – what kind of world are they stable in? Like all the other elements in ours? An anti-world? An opposite one? Parallel? Since all the other qualities are the same. Does that make sense? We don't know what worlds are out there. If we have found here with the help of science what was thought to be magic, i.e. substance with opposite qualities, the same antiproton, why not assume that everything is the same there, but at the same time a little different. For example, other understandings of the sensible. Like in a mirror: you see yourself – and everything seems to be normal. Or as with a thought and its illiterate translation into a text: everything is clear in your head, but in writing – only you alone understand what you wanted to say, while for others it is just mistakes and a set of words. Participants of the first flights, flights of consciousness, will have to know science. They must understand where they are going to end up. This will shape their thoughts – and consciousness will be different, that is, the influence of consciousness on the particles will be kind of intellectual. Consequently, the probability that they will end up in a similarly intelligent world will be high. Well, imagine if they end up in a wild bandit world. Can you imagine how that would affect us?
Chapter 9. Cloning is no longer a secret
It is no secret that throughout human history, information and knowledge have been the most important weapon and value. They have been killed for them, hidden, paid for, organized alliances and waged wars.
Believe me, the level of science that you know, even though it is overwhelming for some, is already yesterday's day for secret groups (and these can be outwardly official associations), and sometimes the Stone Age. Or almost. For example, what would you say if I told you about the possibility of creating a copy of a living being at a time when only such developments were carried out in closed laboratories?
It all started when Theodore Schwann formulated the cell theory. And it was as early as 1838-1839. Then Rudolf Virchow, in 1855, supplemented it with the crucial statement: "every cell is derived from another cell." Hans Dreischau in 1892 divided a four-cell sea urchin embryo into separate cells. Each of the divided cells grew into a normal larva. In 1901, Hans Spiman successfully performed similar experiments on frog embryos consisting of 16 blastomeres cells. In the 40s of the XX century, cloning