Jeffres L., Neuendorf K., Bracken C., Atkin D. Integrating theoretical traditions in media effects // Mass Communication and Society. 2008. V. 11 (4). P. 470–491.
Jorg M. Need for orientation as a predictor of agenda-setting effects // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2008. V. 20 (4). P. 440–453.
KatzE., Lazarsfeld P. Personal influence: The Part played by people in the flow of communication. N. Y.: Free Press, 1955.
Kiousis S. Shields A. Inter-candidate agenda setting in presidential elections // Public Relations Review. 2008 V. 34 (4). P. 325–330.
Klapper J. The effects of mass communication. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press, 1960.
Knobloch S., Zillmann D. Mood management via the digital jukebox // Journal of Communication. 2002. V. 52 (2). P. 351–366.
Littlejohn S. W. Theories of human communication. N. Y., 1989.
Mares M.L., Oliver M.B., Cantor J. Age differences in adults’ emotional motivations for exposure to films // Media Psychology. 2008. V. 11. P. 488–511.
Matabane P. W. Television and the black audience: Cultivating moderate perspectives on racial integration // Journal of Communication. 1988. V. 38. № 4. P. 21–31.
McCombs M. News influence on our pictures of the world // Media Effects / Eds J. Bryant, D. Zillmann. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994.
Morgan M., Shanahan J. Two decades of cultivation research // Communication yearbook 20 / Ed. B. R. Burleson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997. P. 1–47.
Nabi R. Cosmetic surgery makeover programs and intentions to undergo cosmetic enhancements // Communication Research. 2009. V. 35 (1). P. 1–27.
Nabi R., Riddle K. Personality traits, television viewing and the cultivation effect // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 2008. V. 52 (3). P. 327–348.
Neuwirth K., Frederick E., Mayo C. Spiral of silence and fear of isolation // Journal of Communication. 2007. V. 57 (3). P. 450–468.
Niedenthal P. M. Implicit Perception of Affective Information // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1990. V. 26. P. 505–527.
Noelle-Neumann E. The spiral of silence: Public opinion – Our social skin. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984.
Oliver M. B. Tender affective states as predictors of entertainment preference // Journal of Communication. 2008. V. 58. P. 40–61.
Potter W. J. Examining cultivation from a psychological perspective // Communication Research. 1991. V. 18 (1). P. 77–102.
Potter W.J. Cultivation theory and research // Human Communication Research. 1993. V. 19 (4). P. 564–601.
Potter W. J., Chang I. C. Television exposure and the cultivation hypothesis // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 1990. V. 34 (3). P. 313–333.
Prentice D.A., Gerrig R.J., Bailis D. S. What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1997. V. 4. P. 416–420.
Quick B. The effects of viewing Grey’s Anatomy on perceptions of doctors and patient satisfaction // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 2009. V. 53 (1). P. 38–55.
Rogers E. M., Shoemaker F. F. Communication of Innovations: A cross-cultural approach. N. Y.: Free Press, 1971.
Rubin A. M., Windahl S. The uses and dependency model of mass communication // Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 1986. V. 3. P. 184–199.
Shehata A. Unemployment on the Agenda: A Panel Study of Agenda-Setting Effects During the 2006 Swedish National Election Campaign // Journal of Communication. 2010. V. 60 (1). P. 182–203.
Shaw D. L., McCombs M. E. The emergence of American political issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press. St Paul, MN, 1977.
Shrum L. Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect // Human Communication Research. 2001. V. 27 (1). P. 94–120.
Signorielli N., Morgan M. Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.
Tai Z. The structure of knowledge and dynamics of scholarly communication in agenda setting research, 1996–2005 // Journal of Communication. 2009. V. 59 (3). P. 481–513.
Tapper J. The ecology of cultivation // Communication Theory. 1995. V. 5 (1). P. 36–57.
Van Evra J. Television and child development. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990.
Walgrave S., Van Aelst P. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power. Towards A Preliminary Theory // Journal of Communication. 2006. V. 56. P. 88–109.
Wallstein K. Agenda setting and the blogosphere // Review of Policy Research. 2007. V. 24 (6). P. 567–587.
Wanta W., Hu Y. Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 1994а. V. 6 (3). P. 225–240.
Wanta W., Hu Y. The effects of credibility reliance and exposure on media agenda setting // Journalism Quarterly. 1994b. V. 71 (1). P. 90–98.
Weaver J., Wakshlag J. Perceived vulnerability in crime, criminal victimization experience, and television viewing // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 1986. V. 30 (2). P. 141–158.
Wheeler S. C., Green M. C., Brock T. C. Fictional narratives change beliefs // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1999. V. 6. P. 136–141.
Williams D. Virtual cultivation: Online worlds, offline perceptions // Journal of Communication. 2006. V. 56 (1). P. 69–87.
Wimmer R. D., Dominick J. R. Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2010.
Yang H., Ramasubramanian S., Oliver M. Cultivation effects on quality of life indicators // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 2008. V. 52 (2). P. 247–267.
Zillmann D. Mood management through communication choices // American Behavioral Scientist. 1988. V. 31 (3). P. 327–341.
Информационная неопределенность как механизм психологического воздействия
А. Н. Лебедев
Римскому императору Тациту приписывают афоризм, который звучит следующим образом: «Пренебреги клеветой, и она зачахнет». Это высказывание можно интерпретировать так: людям свойственно терять интерес к чему-либо, если этот интерес не подкрепляется новой информацией. Действительно, как показывают открытия последних десятилетий в области экономической психологии, именно отсутствие информации, порождающее неопределенность представлений об объекте или явлении, как это ни странно прозвучит, очень часто формирует весьма устойчивую и целостную модель мира, которая определяет и мировоззрение, и поведение человека