Gender and Sexuality
Sociological Approaches
Momin Rahman and Stevi Jackson
polity
Copyright © Momin Rahman and Stevi Jackson 2010
The right of Momin Rahman and Stevi Jackson to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
First published in 2010 by Polity Press
Polity Press
65 Bridge Street
Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK
Polity Press
350 Main Street
Malden, MA 02148, USA
All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-5525-3
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.
Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
For further information on Polity, visit our website: www.politybooks.com
Introduction
The aim of this brief introduction is to illustrate how the key sociological concepts of structure, culture, self and identity are important to understanding gender and sexuality and how they are dealt with in subsequent chapters. We also give guidance on the format of the chapters, which include exercises, learning outcomes and notes on further resources and reading. However, we begin with an example to demonstrate the importance of a sociological perspective in understanding gender and sexuality.
What Do You Think About Same- Sex Marriage?
In August 2010, a federal judge overruled California’s Proposition 8, which had been passed in November 2008 during the American Presidential election. Proposition 8 overrode previous court rulings that had, since May 2008, permitted same- sex marriages, but it did not overturn the right to domestic partnerships, which California had enacted in 1999. It is worth reviewing some of the protests and the arguments both for and against same- sex marriage (available online at many news channels). You will see the strength of passion on both sides of this debate and we ask you to consider why it is that the right to marriage is such a trigger for social protest against lesbians and gays. In April 2005, one of your authors – Momin Rahman – attended a demonstration in support of the recent passage of a gay rights bill through the state legislature of Maine, USA. Fifty or so gay rights supporters gathered on the balcony of the capitol building, whilst, below, four or five times the number demonstrated their rejection of the proposed bill. Most of those opposed were religious, and we were told that many of these Christian groups had been bussed in from other states to bolster this show of ‘traditional’ moral values. The clothing of choice for the traditionalists was a t- shirt depicting a male and female figure holding hands, with the slogan that marriage was meant to be between a man and woman.
In fact, the proposed legislation was not concerned with same- sex marriage but with equalization of treatment for lesbians and gays [1]. However, given the controversies surrounding lesbian and gay civil union legislation in the USA, and the salience of this issue in the Presidential election of November 2004, it is perhaps not surprising that the possibility of marriage rights in Maine became the focus for the Christian Right. Furthermore, legislation to recognize same- sex civil unions and/or marriage is a truly global issue, with laws passed or under discussion in many countries worldwide, and always in the context of intense public debate [2].
How can we understand and explain the strength of emotion that the recognition of lesbian and gay marriage provokes? Of course, it could be argued that this particular civil right is the latest in a gradual extension of rights to lesbian and gay minorities, beginning for many in Western Europe and North America in the late 1960s and accelerating in the 1990s with the increasing cultural visibility of diverse sexualities. This trend could be seen as part of wider changes in western society that have also resulted in the advance of rights for women and ethnic minorities. We may then account for the controversy over same- sex marriage as the inevitable but temporary battle between traditionalism and democratic social progress. But is this an accurate picture? We suggest not.
A full understanding of such controversies is not possible without a thoroughly sociological analysis of the social organization of sexuality and gender and their social meaning. What such a perspective entails is discussed in the next section.
TASK: Set up a debate about legalizing same- sex marriage (or banning it if you live in a country that has already passed such laws).
Make sure that you have one person that is noting down the arguments made both for and against the motion.
Read the following section to see if the arguments made in the debate relate to the points made below.
Gender, Sexuality and Sociology
Our aim in this text is to demonstrate that gender and sexuality can be understood through the following key issues and concepts in sociology:
social change;
social conflict, social cohesion and social order;
social hierarchies, divisions and inequalities;
social identities;
modernity/late modernity/postmodernity.
We discuss these key issues and concepts throughout the text, but we organize the discussion into parts that cover the central sociological concepts of structure, culture, self and identity. Let us stick with our introductory example to expand and explain. In the western world, the contemporary movements for women’s rights and those of sexual minorities have developed from a period of significant social change since the post-war, mid- twentieth- century decades, affecting women’s access to educational and financial resources, changes in cultural values, religious beliefs and decline in the deference to tradition. This period saw the rise of women’s and gay liberation movements that demanded new political and social rights. These demands challenged tradition, resulting in social conflict. Social conflict thus often arises from social change. This is one way of explaining the common