A Companion to Medical Anthropology. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Культурология
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119718949
Скачать книгу
forced assimilation through residential schools, and government-run food distribution programs. Jernigan links traumas of the past to meanings of Choctaw identity in the present, including the complex understanding of large bodies and related health outcomes. These are just three examples among others that illustrate the power and potential of bringing to the forefront analyses of the feelings, thoughts, emotions, concerns, and anxieties of lived experience into biocultural frameworks tying structural inequalities to biology and health.

      Critical biocultural anthropologists have also begun to ask questions about the biosocial consequences of social issues such as the culture of capitalism as in the work of Elizabeth Sweet and colleagues (2018) on debt and “embodied neoliberalism,” and Hoke and Boen’s (2020) recent research into the health effects of eviction. Taking up subjects of debt, eviction, addiction, incarceration, and homelessness are obvious topics for which a critical biocultural approach might offer insights. These will become ever more critical in upcoming years as a product of profound inequalities and pandemic effects.

      The community-based work (HEAT: Health Equity Alliance of Tallahassee) of Gravlee, community organizers, colleagues, and students in Tallahassee, that of Ravenscroft and Schell (2015) on environmental pollutants in partnership with the Mohawk, and Galloway and coworkers’ (Fafard-St. Germain et al. 2019; Galloway et al. 2020) research on food insecurity and on cancer experiences in partnership with Inuit communities, all point to the value and critical need for more community-engaged and participatory biocultural work. Studies such as these might hopefully be the rule rather than the exception in the future.

      Conclusions

      During the tumultuous start of the second decade of the new millennium, continued police brutality directed against black men and the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed fault lines of power and inequality in the United States and across the globe. Inequities of life chances and access to basic resources such as housing, food, health care, transportation, and the Internet along axes that include race, class, and gender have been laid bare. Critically informed biocultural approaches in medical anthropology, ones that foreground the health consequences of power and inequalities, are one avenue toward a fuller understanding of how large-scale political-economic processes, including a global pandemic and racism in criminal justice, impact local-level lived realities and become embodied.

      Biocultural approaches in medical anthropology have at times occupied center stage and at times have sat on the intellectual periphery. In the latter half of the twentieth century a “chasm” developed between biological and culture perspectives in anthropology, and this was nowhere more evident than in medical anthropology. Yet, there is no escaping that human health – the focus of medical anthropology – is quintessentially a biocultural phenomenon. The question ought not to be whether to engage with biology; rather, it ought to focus us on how biocultural approaches might best enhance our understanding of biology and health in political-economic and sociocultural contexts.

      We argue here for approaches we have termed critical biocultural that lie at the intersection of critical medical and biocultural studies of health. The sources of inequalities, whether they link to political oppression, poor access to markets, structured barriers to land ownership, or failed education and health-care systems, are not trivial. The root causes of poverty or inequality shape the forms they take, discourses and practices, efforts to alleviate the problem, and these are all key to a more complete and “critical” biocultural approach in medical anthropology.

      REFERENCES

      1 Annandale, E. (2014). The Sociology of Health and Medicine: A Critical Introduction, 2nd edn. Polity Press Boston.

      2 Armelagos, G., Brown, P., and Turner, B. (2005). Evolutionary, historical and political economic perspectives on health and disease. Social Science and Medicine 61: 755–765.

      3 Armelagos, G. and Cohen, M.N. (1984). Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture. New York: Academic Press.

      4 Armelagos, G. and Goodman, A. (1998). Race, racism and anthropology. In: Building a New Biocultural Synthesis: Political Economic Perspectives in Biological Anthropology (ed. A. Goodman and T. Leatherman). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 359–378.

      5 Armelagos, G., Leatherman, T., Ryan, M., and Sibley, L. (1992). Biocultural synthesis in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology 14: 35–52.

      6 Baer, H. (1996). Toward a political ecology of health in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10 (4): 451–454.

      7 Barker, D.J.P., Eriksson, J.G., Forsén, T., and Osmond, C. (2002). Fetal origins of adult disease: Strength of effects and biological basis. International Journal of Epidemiology 31: 1235–1239.

      8 Benezra, A., DeStefano, J., and Gordon, J. (2012). Anthropology of microbes. PNAS 109 (17): 6378–6381.

      9 Bindon, J. (1997). Coming of age of human adaptability studies in Samoa. In: Human Adaptability Past, Present and Future (ed. S.J. Ulijasek and R. Huss-Ashmore), 126–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      10 Blakey, M. (1994). Psychophysiological stress and disorders of industrial society: A critical theoretical formulation for biocultural research. In: Diagnosing America: Anthropology and Public Engagement (ed. S. Forman), 149–192. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

      11 Blakey, M. (1998). Beyond European enlightenment: Toward a critical and humanistic human biology. In: Building a New Biocultural Synthesis: Political Economic Perspectives in Biological Anthropology (ed. A. Goodman and T. Leatherman). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press 379-406.

      12 Blakely, M. (2001). Bioarcheology of the African Diaspora in The Americas: Its origin and scope. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 30: 387–422.

      13 Bogin,