Power Flow Control Solutions for a Modern Grid Using SMART Power Flow Controllers. Kalyan K. Sen. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Kalyan K. Sen
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Физика
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119824381
Скачать книгу
(Vs′) as shown in Figure 1-27. The relationship is given by the following equation:

      where

      (2‐61)equation

      For a Shunt–Series Compensator, the relationship between active and reactive power flows (Pr and Qr) at the receiving end is shown by the small circle in Figure 1-27 and is given by the following equation:

      where Prn and Qrn are the natural active and reactive power flows at the receiving end of the line and

Schematic illustration of independent active and reactive power flow controller with local reactive power compensation using a Shunt–Series Compensator-based UPFC.

      The Shunt–Series Compensator connects a compensating voltage in series with the line at any relative phase angle in the range of 0°β ≤ 360° with respect to the line voltage at the POC. Figure 1-27 shows that a series‐compensating voltage of 0.2 pu modifies the power angle by 11.54°, which may be near the allowable limit. The most important and unique feature of the Shunt–Series configuration is that for a given amount of transmission line power, the series‐connected VSC has a large leverage between its own rating and the controlled transmission line power. The series‐compensating voltage needs to be rated for only a fractional amount of transmitted power, whereas the shunt‐connected VSC in the Shunt–Shunt configuration has no such leverage and it needs to be rated for the full amount of transmitted power. Because of this uniqueness, the Shunt–Series configuration is a preferred topology for a PFC. However, in some special cases for point‐to‐point transfer of power between two isolated networks with POC voltages (Vs and Vs′) as shown in Figure 1-26 or interconnection of two transmission lines with different voltages or phase angles (or frequencies), Shunt–Shunt configuration may be the preferred solution. One such system, called the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Interconnections, consists of Eastern Interconnection, Western Interconnection, and Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Interconnection, which are three separate systems of 60 Hz frequency that are asynchronous to each other. Another such system exists in Japan, connecting a 50 Hz frequency system in the North and the East with a 60 Hz frequency system in the South and the West, that is asynchronous to each other.

      As a special case, when the DC link capacitors of the two VSCs are not connected together, each of the shunt‐connected VSC (STATCOM) and the series‐connected VSC (SSSC) provides only a reactive power compensation that is independent of each other. Since there is no exchange of active power between the STATCOM and the SSSC, they act as RRs (Xsh or Xse = XC or − XL).