26. Ma, J., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Turban, E., Wang, S., Liu, O., An ontology-based text-mining method to cluster proposals for research project selection. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans, 42, 3, 784–790, 2012.
27. Kontopoulos, E., Berberidis, C., Dergiades, T., Bassiliades, N., Ontology-based sentiment analysis of twitter posts. Expert Syst. Appl., 40 10, 4065–4074, 2013.
28. Thakor, P. and Sasi, S., Ontology-based sentiment analysis process for social media content’. INNS Conference on Big Data 2015 Procedia Computer Science, vol. 53, pp. 199–207, 2015.
29. Ali, F., Kwak, K.S., Kim, Y.G., Opinion mining based on fuzzy domain ontology and Support Vector Machine: A proposal to automate online review classification’. Appl. Soft Comput., 47, 3, 235–250, 2016.
30. Popescu, O. and Etzioni, Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing HLT-EMNLP, pp. 339– 346, 2005.
31. McGlohon, M., Glance, N., Reiter, Z., Star quality: Aggregating reviews to rank products and merchants. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 114–121, 2010.
32. Harb, A., Plantié, M., Dray, G., Roche, M., Trousset, F., Poncelet, P., Web opinion mining: How to extract opinions from blogs? Proceedings of CSTST ‘08 International Conference on Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology, pp. 211–217, 2008.
33. Qiu, G., Liu, B., Bu, J., Chen, C., Expanding domain sentiment lexicon through double propagation. Comput. Ling., 37, 1, 9–27, 2008.
34. Chawla, K., Ramteke, A., Bhattacharyya, P., IITB-sentiment-analysts: Participation in sentiment analysis in twitter semeval 2013 task. Proceedings of Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 495–500, 2013.
35. Ding, X. and Liu, B., The utility of linguistic rules in opinion mining. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development on Information Retrieval, SIGIR’07, Amsterdam, 2007.
36. Poirier, D., Bothorel, C., Neef, E.C.D., Boull´e, M., Automating opinion analysis in film reviews: The case of statistic versus Linguistic approach. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Morocco, pp. 94–101, 2008.
37. Na, J.C., Thet, T.T., Khoo, C., Comparing sentiment expression in movie reviews from four online genres. Online Inf. Rev., 34, 2, 317–338, 2010.
38. Park, S., Cha, B., An, D.U., ‘Automatic multi-document summarization based on clustering and nonnegative matrix factorization. IETE Tech. Rev., 27, 2, 167–178, 2010.
39. Basiri, M.E., Naghsh-Nilchi, A.R., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., Sentiment prediction based on dempster-shafer theory of evidence. Math. Prob. Eng., 2014, 361201, Vol. 1, pp. 1–13.
40. Chow, C.C., A strategic service quality approach using analytic hierarchy process. Managing Service Quality, 15, 3, 278–289, 2005.
41. Uddin, A. and Singh, V.K., A quantity–quality composite ranking of indian institutions in CS research. IETE Tech. Rev., 32, 5, 273–283, 2015.
42. Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H., Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of TOPSIS and VIKOR approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 156, 445–455, 2004.
43. Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H., Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods’. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 178, 514–529, 2007.
44. Amiri, M.P., Project selection for oil-fields development by using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 9, 6218–6224, 2010.
45. Velasquez, M. and Hester, P.T., An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res., 10, 2, 56–66, 2013.
46. Liu, D.R. and Shih, Y.Y., Integrating AHP and data mining for product recommendation based on customer lifetime value. Inf. Manage., 42, 387–400, 2005.
47. Yazdi, A.K., Designing a mathematical model for indicators of service quality in the tourism industry based on SERVQUAL and Rembrandt methods. Int. J. Productivity Qual. Manage., 15, 4, 511–527, 2015.
48. Buyukozkan, G. and Cifci, G., A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 3, 2341–2354, 2012.
49. Hdioud, F., Frikh, B., Ouhbi, B., Multi-criteria recommender systems based on multi-attribute decision making. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Integration and Web based Application and Services IIWAS 2013, Vienna, Austria, pp. 203–210, 2013.
50. Kang, D. and Park, Y., Review-based measurement of customer satisfaction in mobile service: Sentiment analysis and VIKOR approach. Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 4, 1041–1050, 2014.
51. Sanayei, S., Mousavi, F., Yazdankhah, A., Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 24–30, 2010.
52. Paralic, J. and Kostial, I., A document retrieval method based on ontology associations. J. Inf. Org. Sci., 27, 2, 93–99, 2003.
53. Saif, H., He, Y., Alani, H., Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter. Inf. Process. Manage., 52, 1, 5–19, 2016.
54. Liu, B., Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, California, USA, 2012.
55. Astudillo, R.F., Amir, S.F., Ling, W., Martins, B., Silva, M., Trancoso, I., INESC-ID: A regression model for large scale twitter sentiment lexicon induction. Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), Colorado, pp. 613–618, 2015.
56. Zhang, W., Yoshida, T., Tang, X., A comparative study of TF_IDF, LSI and multi-words for text classification. Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 2758–2765, 2011.
57. Kumar, A. and Srinivas, S., On the performance Latent Semantic Indexing-based Information Retrieval. J. Comput. Inf. Technol., 3, 259–264, 2009.
58. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I., Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 993–1022, 2003.
59. Griffiths, T.L. and Steyvers, M., Finding scientific topics. PNAS, 101, 1, 5228– 5235, 2004.
60. Binkley, D., Heinz, D., Lawrie, D., Overfelt, J., Understanding LDA in source code analysis. Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Programme Comprehension ICPC, Hyderabad, India, vol. 14, pp. 26–36, 2014.
61. Liu, B., Web Data Mining, Springer, New York, USA, 2007.
62. Robert, J.D., An examination of consumer criteria for choosing hospital services, 1995. Available from: http://library3.sage.edu/archive/thesis/MGT/MGT-d255-dam-ane.pdf, pp. 1–41, January 2016.
63. Agarwal, P. and Janssens, B., Power to the patient: A new growth paradigm for Indian providers. BCG. perspectives, 2014. Vol. 1, pp.1–2. Available from: <https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/health_care_payers_providers_power_to_patient_new_growth_paradigm_for_indian_providers/>. [9-Nov-2015].
64. Kang, H., Yoo, S.J., Han, D., Senti-lexicon and improved Naïve Bayes algorithms for sentiment analysis of restaurant reviews. Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 5, 6000–6010, 2012. Elsevier.
1 *Corresponding author: [email protected]
Конец