and Type 410 Stainless Steel Fretting‐Wear Cur...Fig. 13-21 Displacement Plots ‐ Drilled‐Hole Test (Fisher et al, 1995).Fig. 13-22 Drilled‐Hole Test Results (Fisher et al, 1995).Fig. 13-23 Displacement Plots ‐ Broached‐Hole Test (Fisher et al, 1995).Fig. 13-24 Broached‐Hole Test Results (Fisher et al, 1995).Fig. 13-25 Inconel 600 Tubing and Carbon Steel Fretting‐Wear Curve (Fisher e...Fig. 13-26 SEM Photograph at 40x Magnification of the Worn Surface of the In...Fig. 13-27 Typical Tube‐to‐Support Relative Motion: a) Flat‐Bar Support and ...Fig. 13-28 Effect of Temperature on Fretting‐Wear Coefficients for Incoloy 8...Fig. 13-29 Effect of Temperature on Fretting‐Wear Coefficients for Incoloy 8...Fig. 13-30 Effect of Steam Generator Chemistry Control on Fretting Wear of I...Fig. 13-31 Tube‐to‐Drilled‐Hole‐Support Relative Motion (Guérout and Fisher,...Fig. 13-32 Effect of Boric Acid on Fretting Wear of Inconel 600 Tubing and T...Fig. 13-33 Effect of Support Geometry on Fretting Wear of Incoloy 800 Tubing...Fig. 13-34 Effect of Tube Material on Fretting Wear for Type 410 Stainless S...Fig. 13-35 Fretting‐Wear Results at High Temperature for Various Types of No...Fig. 13-36 Fretting‐Wear Results of Incoloy 800 Tubing versus Type 321 Stain...
14 Appendix AFig. 3-5 Example 3-1 ‐ Process Heat Exchanger Schematic.Fig. 11-10 Fluctuating Force Lift Coefficients for Tube Bundles in Single‐Ph...Fig. 3-6 Example 3-2 ‐ U‐Bend Schematic.Fig. 10-14 Steam‐Water and Freon Flow Regime Maps.Fig. 12-14a Contact Between a Steam Generator Tube and Flat‐Bar‐Type (AVB) S...Fig. A-1 Wear Volume versus Wear Depth.
