Wild Music
A pianist plays in front of the riot police during the Maidan Revolution. Copyright Eliash Strongowski after a photograph by Oleg Matsekh, 2013.
Maria Sonevytsky
WILD MUSIC
Sound and Sovereignty in Ukraine
Wesleyan University Press Middletown, Connecticut
Wesleyan University Press
Middletown, CT 06459
© 2019 Maria Sonevytsky
All rights reserved
Manufactured in the United States of America
Designed by Mindy Basinger Hill
Typeset in Minion Pro
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available upon request
Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-8195-7915-7
Paperback ISBN: 978-0-8195-7916-4
Ebook ISBN: 978-0-8195-7917-1
5 4 3 2 1
Front cover illustration by Sashko Danylenko.
What a view from the West-North of these regions, when one day the spirit of civilization (Kultur) will visit them! The Ukraine will become a new Greece: the beautiful heaven of this people, their merry existence, their musical nature, their fruitful land, and so on, will one day awaken: out of so many little wild peoples (kleinen wilden Völkern), as the Greeks were also once, a mannered (gesittete) nation will come to be: their borders will stretch out to the Black Sea and from there through the world. Hungary, these nations, and an area of Poland and Russia will be participants in this new civilization (Kultur); from the northwest this spirit will go over Europe, which lies in sleep, and make it subservient (dienstbar) to this spirit. This all lies ahead, and must one day happen; but how? When? Through whom?
Johann Gottfried Herder, Journal meiner Reise im Jahr 1769
«Будь ласка, давайте не будемо варварами!»
(Please, let’s not be barbarians!)
Sign hanging in the entryway of an apartment building in Kyiv, 2011
CONTENTS
Note on Names and Transliteration xxi
ONE Wild Dances: Ethnic Intimacy, Auto-Exoticism, and Infrastructural Activism 27
TWO Freak Cabaret: Politics and Aesthetics in the Time of Revolution 58
THREE Ungovernable Timbres: The Failures of the Rural Voice on Reality TV 85
FOUR Eastern Music: The Liminal Sovereign Imaginaries of Crimea 114
FIVE Ethno-Chaos: Provincializing Russia Through Ukrainian World Music 139
CONCLUSION Dreamland: Becoming Acoustic Citizens 168
KEY SITES REFERENCED IN THIS BOOK
PREFACE
Sovereignty, a key term of this musical ethnographic study, emerges from the exigencies of Ukrainian political instability. The revolutionary upheavals of the Maidan in 2013–2014 called Ukrainian political sovereignty into question for the second time in a decade, disrupting the lives of many of my interlocutors and demanding that I acknowledge how much the conceptual terrain had shifted since I began my research in Ukraine in 2004. As the previously unthinkable challenges to Ukraine’s territorial integrity increased in 2014 with Russia’s opportunistic seizing of Crimea and provocations on the eastern borders, I had the opportunity, as an ethnographer, to see my own investments in the project of Ukrainian statehood come into relief. Until then, Wildness—the other key term of this study—had been my focus; in the first iteration of this project, I studied two borderland populations (Crimean Tatars and Hutsuls), observing how modern-day discourses of civilization and barbarism were made audible through musical practices. After the borders of contemporary Ukraine became contested in the aftermath of the Maidan, I was forced to confront the ways in which I had been taking the political sovereignty of Ukraine as an overly convenient way to bound my comparative project.
Apart from the fact that I had largely studied the musical practices of Ukrainian citizens for whom the state’s political sovereignty was meaningful and important, I had to reexamine the assumptions of my own politicized subject position as a child of the postwar Ukrainian-American diaspora, which carried with it a baseline belief that Ukrainian statehood was a legitimate project. (In Abu-Lughod’s [1991] memorable term, this split identity marks me as a “halfie.”) As Crimean Tatars were ordered to trade in their Ukrainian passports for Russian ones, as Hutsuls became newly caricatured by Russian media as part of a rabid neofascist takeover of Ukraine, as the Russian state vowed to defend its Russian-speaking compatriots abroad, I could no longer take the legitimacy of the state for granted. Pragmatic questions about how to continue research in certain regions led to conceptual ones, such as whether to refer to the people who were fleeing from Crimea or the conflict zones in the eastern Donbas and Luhansk regions as internally displaced persons (IDPS) or refugees—a difference in terminology that belied a larger political reality as to whether these territories of Ukraine had been, in fact, absorbed by another sovereign power.
Inspired by Madina Tlostanova and Walter Mignolo’s (2012) call that scholars situated in the West must strive to “learn to unlearn in order to relearn,” I offer this prefatory note to situate myself within this musical ethnographic study of Wildness and sovereignty, in the hope that it lays bare the continuing process of my own (re)education.1 In Ukraine, people who get to know me well have sometimes referred to me as nasha Amerykanka (our American).2 I have long recognized that this term of intimacy, while endearing, risks obscuring just how different my lived experience and horizons of opportunity—as a middle-class American citizen who was working toward and eventually earned a PhD at a prestigious university in New York City—were from the limited conditions I often encountered throughout Ukraine. At the same time, my inability to pass fully as Ukrainian in many contexts made me a target of