Papers from Lilliput. J. B. Priestley. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: J. B. Priestley
Издательство: Bookwire
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Языкознание
Год издания: 0
isbn: 4057664620194
Скачать книгу
tion>

       J. B. Priestley

      Papers from Lilliput

      Published by Good Press, 2019

       [email protected]

      EAN 4057664620194

       ON A CERTAIN PROVINCIAL PLAYER

       ON A NEW KIND OF FICTION

       A MAD SHEPHERD

       AUDACITY IN AUTHORSHIP

       IN PRAISE OF THE HYPERBOLE

       ON CARTOMANCY

       ON BEING KIND TO THE OLD

       THE DREAM

       ON FILLING IN FORMS

       THREE MEN

       THE BOGEY OF SPACE

       A ROAD TO ONESELF

       THE EDITOR

       ON AN OLD BOOK OF NATURAL HISTORY

       ON NOT MEETING AUTHORS

       THE ETERNAL CHEAP JACK

       HOLIDAY NOTES FROM THE COAST OF BOHEMIA

       ON A MOUTH-ORGAN

       AN APOLOGY FOR BAD PIANISTS

       A FATHER’S TRAGEDY

       ON GETTING OFF TO SLEEP

       ON TRAVEL BY TRAIN

       THE PEEP

       ON VULGAR ERRORS

       ON GOSSIP

       A ROAD AND SOME MOODS

       ON A CERTAIN CONTEMPORARY ESSAYIST

       ON LIFE AND LUCKY-BAGS

       GRIGSBY—A RECORD AND AN APPRECIATION

       A PARAGON OF HOSTS

       Table of Contents

      IT has been said that literature must use its gift of praise or it will come to nothing. Those of us who keep up a little dribble of ink, though we aspire to be very Swifts, must ultimately bestow our commendation somewhere: our praise is the last, greatest and kindliest weapon in our poor armoury. If we can applaud where most men have kept silent, so much the better: we are fine fellows, using our little tricks to sweeten the world. So much preamble is necessary because I wish to bring forward, in this season of burning questions, the figure of a poor player who died over one hundred and fifty years ago and whose very name is now only known to a few. True, it can be found in many places, but who goes to them? For my part, I have rescued him from the pages of The Eccentric Mirror, a quaint production of four volumes, ‘reflecting (I quote the title-page) a faithful and interesting delineation of Male and Female Characters, Ancient and Modern, Who have been particularly distinguished by extraordinary Qualifications, Talents, and Propensities, natural or acquired.’ There, among fat men, giants, freaks and eccentrics, I found our hero, Bridge Frodsham, a country actor, once known as the ‘York Garrick.’ He comes rather late in the series of characters, and is only there at all because the compiler was probably running short of better material, such as fat men, murderers, misers, and the like. Even then, Frodsham is scurvily treated; he is set down simply as a very good specimen of the conceited, self-opinionated young fool; the greatness that was in him is entirely missed; and it has been left for us, at this late hour, to give him his meed of praise. But let us turn to the details of his story, which I shall filch for the most part from The Eccentric Mirror, and thereby get myself some return for the four shillings and sixpence I paid for it.

      Bridge Frodsham was born at the town of Frodsham, in Cheshire, in the year 1734. As you may guess, he belonged, like a true hero, to an ancient family. His education was begun at Westminster, but owing to some youthful imprudence he ran away and joined a company of strolling players. It was not long before he had drifted to York, where he became the leading actor at the little make-shift theatre. He was not, it appears, without talent, for he soon became the darling of the theatre-going crowd, such as it was, of that city. York knew no better actor than Frodsham, who was acclaimed in all the local pot-houses, where he was something of a boon companion. Hear the author of The Eccentric Mirror on this very theme:

      ‘Such was the infatuation of the public at York, and indeed so superior were Frodsham’s talents to those of all his coadjutors that he cast them all into the shade. This superiority was by no means a fortunate circumstance for Frodsham. It filled him with vanity and shut up every avenue to improvement; nor had he any opportunity for observation, as no actors of any high repute were ever known to tread the York stage, and he was never more than ten days in London.’

      Even in this passage, short as it is, you will have remarked a certain air of patronage, a suspicion of asperity, and you will be on your guard; for this London hack, this biographer of dwarfs and infant prodigies, who dotes on filthy misers and becomes lyrical in praise of Daniel Lambert, is trying to rob our sturdy provincial of his greatness. For greatness he certainly achieved, and not at York, mark you, among his pot-house followers, but in London, during a short