Social Cognition A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Зарубежная деловая литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781867461357
Скачать книгу
for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

      <--- Score

      63. What situation(s) led to this Social cognition Self Assessment?

      <--- Score

      64. How are you going to measure success?

      <--- Score

      65. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

      <--- Score

      66. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?

      <--- Score

      67. What needs to be done?

      <--- Score

      68. What do you need to start doing?

      <--- Score

      69. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

      <--- Score

      70. Do you need different information or graphics?

      <--- Score

      71. Is the quality assurance team identified?

      <--- Score

      72. Does Social cognition create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

      <--- Score

      73. Are there Social cognition problems defined?

      <--- Score

      74. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

      <--- Score

      75. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      76. Consider your own Social cognition project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

      <--- Score

      77. Who needs to know?

      <--- Score

      78. What is the Social cognition problem definition? What do you need to resolve?

      <--- Score

      79. Which information does the Social cognition business case need to include?

      <--- Score

      80. Do you need to avoid or amend any Social cognition activities?

      <--- Score

      81. How do you assess your Social cognition workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

      <--- Score

      82. What information do users need?

      <--- Score

      83. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?

      <--- Score

      84. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?

      <--- Score

      85. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Social cognition team, Social cognition itself?

      <--- Score

      86. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Social cognition delivery, for example is new software needed?

      <--- Score

      87. Did you miss any major Social cognition issues?

      <--- Score

      88. What Social cognition events should you attend?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

      <--- Score

      90. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

      <--- Score

      91. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

      <--- Score

      92. What do employees need in the short term?

      <--- Score

      93. What are the Social cognition resources needed?

      <--- Score

      94. What Social cognition capabilities do you need?

      <--- Score

      95. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Social cognition? In other words, what are the risks, if Social cognition does not deliver successfully?

      <--- Score

      96. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Social cognition Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      2. What is the scope of the Social cognition work?

      <--- Score

      3. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      4. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Social cognition?

      <--- Score

      5. How can the value of Social cognition be defined?

      <--- Score

      6. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Social cognition work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you manage changes in Social cognition requirements?

      <--- Score

      8. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      9. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      10. What are the record-keeping requirements of Social cognition activities?

      <--- Score

      11. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      12. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      13. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      14. What are (control) requirements for Social cognition Information?

      <--- Score

      15. Is there a clear Social cognition case definition?

      <--- Score

      16. When