Edmund G. Ross
The Impeachment of President Andrew Johnson
History of the First Attempt to Impeach the President of the United States
Published by
Books
- Advanced Digital Solutions & High-Quality eBook Formatting -
2018 OK Publishing
No claim to original U.S. Government Works
ISBN 978-80-272-4161-3
Table of Contents
CHAPTER I — THE PROBLEM OF RECONSTRUCTION
CHAPTER II — THE BALTIMORE CONVENTION
CHAPTER III — MR. JOHNSON'S ACCESSION TO THE PRESIDENCY
CHAPTER IV — FIRST ATTEMPT TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT
CHAPTER V — THE TENURE-OF-OFFICE ACT
CHAPTER VI — IMPEACHMENT AGREED TO BY THE HOUSE
CHAPTER VII — IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE
CHAPTER VIII — ORGANIZATION OF THE COURT ARGUMENT OF COUNSEL
CHAPTER IX — EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES AND THEIR TESTIMONY
CHAPTER X — A CONFERENCE HELD AND THE FIRST VOTE TAKEN
CHAPTER XI — THE IMPEACHERS IN A MAZE. A RECESS ORDERED
CHAPTER XII — WAS IT A PARTISAN PROSECUTION?
CHAPTER XIII — THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OF IMPEACHMENT
PREFACE
Little is now known to the general public of the history of the attempt to remove President Andrew Johnson in 1868, on his impeachment by the House of Representatives and trial by the Senate for alleged high crimes and misdemeanors in office, or of the causes that led to it. Yet it was one of the most important and critical events, involving possibly the gravest consequences, in the entire history of the country.
The constitutional power to impeach and remove the President had lain dormant since the organization of the Government, and apparently had never been thought of as a means for the satisfaction of political enmities or for the punishment of alleged executive misdemeanors, even in the many heated controversies between the President and Congress that had theretofore arisen. Nor would any attempt at impeachment have been made at that time but for the great numerical disparity then existing between the respective representatives in Congress of the two political parties of the country.
One-half the members of that Congress, both House and Senate, are now dead, and with them have also gone substantially the same proportion of the people at large, but many of the actors therein who have passed away, lived long enough to see, and were candid enough to admit, that the failure of the impeachment had brought no harm to the country, while the general judgment practically of all has come to be that a grave and threatening danger was thereby averted.
A new generation is now in control of public affairs and the destinies of the Nation have fallen to new hands. New issues have developed and will continue to develop from time to time; and new dangers will arise, with increasing numbers and changing conditions, demanding in their turn the same careful scrutiny, wisdom and patriotism in adjustment. But the principles that underlie and constitute the basis of our political organism, are and will remain the same; and will never cease to demand constant vigilance for their perpetuation as the rock of safety upon which our federative system is founded.
To those who in the study of the country's past seek a broader and higher conception of the duties of American citizenship, the facts pertaining to the controversy between the Executive and Congress as to the restoration and preservation of the Union, set out in the following pages, will be interesting and instructive. No one is better fitted than the author of this volume to discuss the period of reconstruction in which, as a member of the Federal senate, he played so potent and patriotic a part, and it is a pleasure to find that he has discharged his task with so much ability and care. But it is profoundly hoped that no coming generation will be called upon to utilize the experiences of the past in facing in their day, in field or forum, the dangers of disruption and anarchy, mortal strife and desolation, between those of one race, and blood, and nationality, that marked the history of America thirty years ago.
DAVID B. HILL.
CHAPTER I — THE PROBLEM OF RECONSTRUCTION
MR. LINCOLN'S PLAN
The close of the War of the Rebellion, in 1865, found the country confronted by a civil problem quite as grave as the contest of arms that had been composed. It was that of reconstruction, or the restoration of the States lately in revolt, to their constitutional relations to the Union.
The country had just emerged from a gigantic struggle of physical force of four years duration between the two great Northern and Southern sections. That struggle had been from its inception to its close, a continuing exhibition, on both sides, of stubborn devotion to a cause, and its annals had been crowned with illustrations of the grandest race and personal courage the history of the world records. Out of a population of thirty million people, four million men were under arms, from first to last, and sums of money quite beyond the limit of ordinary comprehension, were expended in its prosecution. There was bloodshed without stint. Both sides to the conflict fought for an idea — on the one side for so-called State Rights and local self-government — on the other for national autonomy as the surest guaranty of all rights — personal, local, and general.
The institution of negro slavery, the basis of the productive industries of the States of the South, which had from